Showing posts with label Sam Rainsy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sam Rainsy. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

CNRP: THE UNITY THAT IS NOT SO UNITED!


THE UNITY THAT IS NOT SO UNITED!



Kevin Ponniah did an excellent job in filing this lengthy report. It is an eye opener for both-- leaders and supporters of CNRP. Their UNITY is not real.


A better organizational structure must be formed or reorganized with transparency. Top leaders must not be interested in only the money...They must know who is who among the supporters.
Those leaders who push for the division have to stop instigating their personal puppets... and the followers should speak up and must not be or become only yes-men.

The problems have been dragged on too long and they are as the result of a fake unity from top to bottom.

MOST IMPORTANTLY INTERNAL CORRUPTION and NEPOTISM, etc... should be stopped.

DON'T BE HYPOCRITE!

-------------------------------


http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/continental-divide-cnrp

As a group of longtime opposition party activists from across North America gathered for its first national convention at the ballroom of the Marriott hotel in Long Beach, California, on Saturday, tensions were running unusually high.
There had been threats of protests, and leaders of the Cambodia National Rescue Party North America (CNRP-NA), as the group calls itself, had contacted the police in advance to ensure that nothing went awry.
But the would-be demonstrators they feared weren’t ruling Cambodian People’s Party supporters living in the area. They were disgruntled members of the same party. 
Discord between CNRP supporters of different stripes has been simmering below the surface in the US and Canada ever since the Sam Rainsy Party (SRP) and Kem Sokha’s Human Rights Party (HRP) merged well ahead of last July’s election.
But despite the tension, the fledgling marriage held fast as supporters banded together to finance the new party’s election campaign and support the wave of post-poll protests trying to bring down Prime Minister Hun Sen that followed.
In recent months, however, as the political situation has cooled, those tensions have come to a head, with supporters splitting largely along former party lines. The leaders of the CNRP-NA are aligned with the SRP, but numerous local chapters, including Long Beach, have stronger links with the HRP.
The split has threatened to throw the opposition’s key funding base into disarray.
“From the start, the SRP has not wanted to join us,” said Titthana Tith, president of CNRP Long Beach and a longtime Kem Sokha supporter. “They say they are the biggest party and they don’t want anybody [else] to come. They want to be on top of everything, all of the US, all of North America.”
According to Tith, the CNRP-NA (formerly known as the SRP-NA, or Sam Rainsy Party-North America) has never truly welcomed the union with Sokha’s smaller Human Rights Party.
“We shut our mouth for the past two years,” Tith said. “We didn’t want to have any infighting, because we can’t topple the dictatorship with infighting. So we shut our mouth and did our job here in Long Beach.
“But suddenly [CNRP] NA has a problem in the last year, they want to control us and take money from us.… So we asked the CNRP to eliminate CNRP-NA, as they are [trying] to create a party within a party.”
Long Beach is home to the biggest Cambodian diaspora community in the United States. A Cambodian-American source close to the matter – who asked for anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the dispute – told the Post that the North American split is merely a “mirror” of what lies below the surface of the party as a whole, due to a deficit of trust.
CNRP Long Beach, like many city or state-level fundraising chapters in the US, opposes CNRP-NA’s belief that it should be the official continent-wide representative of the Cambodian opposition. In February, at least 15 local CNRP chapters across the US wrote to Rainsy and Sokha denouncing CNRP-NA. 
Members of CNRP Long Beach were only talked out of protesting at the Marriott event after a conference call with opposition leader Sam Rainsy days before. Rainsy was meant to fly in and appear at the convention in person, but spoke via Skype instead, a move some in the US attributed to the controversy.
In recent months, the Phnom Penh leadership has scrambled to placate its diverse range of backers with a series of directives and statements aimed at decentralising overseas networks – statements that have been interpreted in different ways.
According to Tith, a new group called CNRP USA, which seeks to bring together opposition groups in 30 states, has now been formed. Tith claimed members came from “both sides” of the union.
But leaders of CNRP-NA, which raised more than $1 million in 2013 and 2014 for the party, say that they are “the backbone of the party”.
“[For] 18 years, we’ve done a lot of work, political, financial to support the party,” said Chea Kim Ly, the group’s president.
Because of this, they say they deserve a degree of autonomy from the CNRP in Phnom Penh.
They refute allegations that they have turned up their noses at working with former HRP backers and instead say they welcome anyone to collaborate with them. 
However, CNRP-NA members also argue that all funds donated by North American supporters at the city, state and country level should be going through them to ensure transparency and accountability.
The anonymous Cambodian-American source, a former HRP fundraiser who says he quit because of a lack of transparency, told the Post that smaller groups aligned with Kem Sokha have been funnelling money to him directly and that many are questioning where those funds are really going. 
While Kim Ly declined to name names and did not make the same allegations, he agreed that these small groups were mostly aligned with the HRP.
“When any group does whatever they want, you open up a lot of room for opportunists and it is no good for the party,” he said. “No institutions or party can run like this, it should [have] an organisational structure.”
But it appears Rainsy and Sokha disagree with that notion. In a September 29 directive, they said the situation with overseas supporters was “complicated” and that internal regulations were being ignored.
Deputy leader of the Cambodia National Rescue party, Kem Sokha
Deputy leader of the Cambodia National Rescue party, Kem Sokha, posses for a photo with supporters in San Jose, California, in April during a forum on the political deadlock in Cambodia. PHOTO SUPPLIED
“So, during this transitional period, the CNRP would like to instruct all compatriots who are members and supporters overseas that you can create a supporting group based on your own will and each group can contact the central headquarters of the CNRP directly,” the directive said.
This angered some supporters aligned with Rainsy, who accused the CNRP of being captured by the interests of Sokha’s faction.
“Once a leader (Kem Sokha with his group) puts self interest beyond national interest, he will bring down the entire organization,” a supporter named Ratha Touch from Lowell, Massachusetts, posted on Facebook. “After 18 years with Sam Rainsy, it is the first time that I realize how incompetent he is. How can a huge organization with 25 elected MPs and thousand members be controlled/hijacked by an incompetent party with only 3 elected MPs?”
CNRP-NA is also perplexed by rumours that the central leadership is trying to shut them down on the orders of Sokha.
On September 24, CNRP information head Meach Sovannara, a former HRP official, blasted the CNRP-NA on Khmer Post Radio, an online station that he runs.
“Some CNRP supporters who want to hold a convention are illegal and violating internal regulations for overseas [groups],” he said, adding that although the group had announced Rainsy was attending, there had been no approval from the party’s permanent committee.
On September 30, the CNRP-NA released a statement condemning Sovannara’s “political assault”.
“The timing of the assault on the CNRP-NA and its leaders is highly questionable, politically motivated, irresponsible and extremely divisive. Remarks made during the interview [were] not factual, inappropriate and [made] without knowledge or consent of the leadership,” the group said.
Despite Sovannara’s remarks, on Saturday, in the Marriot’s ballroom, Rainsy greeted his longtime CNRP-NA supporters via Skype to kick off their convention.
“Though I’m so far, thousands of kilometres away, I meet you all who I used to work together with … I remember all your devotion and efforts,” he reassured them, before addressing the elephant in the room.
“I know that overseas people have not worked in the same way as the people in Cambodia, as one party,” Rainsy said.
“The Sam Rainsy Party and Human Rights Party have merged together, so we have worked as one, we have no brawling. We are recognised as one party. So I would like to appeal to all CNRP here [in North America] to unite as one like in Cambodia. Here, you have no unity like in Cambodia.
“I have received a lot of information that this group [overseas] is not good or another group is not good ... I cannot accept only one group and deny another group,” he said.
Rainsy added that “one day” an official overseas entity would be created to represent the party.
CNRP-NA, however, still appears to believe that it is the legitimate representative of the party in North America. 
The convention adopted “recommendations” that they be able to appoint two representatives on the party’s steering committee in Phnom Penh and have the right to ignore directives from the central leadership.
Members also want to set up a joint convention across three continents.
It’s clear they also feel spurned.
“[The CNRP-NA] recommends that CNRP-PP must recognise and respect CNRP-NA leadership, which has done its best to reach out to the CNRP leadership in Phnom Penh, but received no proper reply, no sense of recognition, nor appreciation regardless of our quality human resources with years of service and commitment,” the group said. 
When reached by email yesterday, Rainsy said there was “no unique official representative” of the CNRP in North America.
He also appeared to admit that small groups of supporters were funnelling donations directly to Sokha rather than sending funds to the CNRP treasury.
“In free and democratic countries such as the USA and Canada people can do whatever they want as long as they are not engaged in illegal activities,” he said. “This applies all the more to volunteers who spend their own money the way they want. Any regulations are difficult to implement.”
But Rainsy rejected the idea that splits along SRP/HRP lines in the US were reflective of wider party divisions, citing his and Sokha’s “maturity in leading the CNRP” as a united force.
“At the same time, we have noticed that, among some CNRP supporters abroad, there are a lot of ego problems. Hence the decentralisation policy we have adopted to deal with our different overseas support groups.”
Sokha hung up on a Post reporter yesterday when asked to address these issues.
Party spokesman Yim Sovann characterised issues among North American supporters as minor and said any antagonism was based on “personal opinions”.
“Of course there are some little differences, but everybody respects the leaders.”

Saturday, October 4, 2014

Sam Rainsy: WASH YOUR OWN SHIRT...

WASH YOUR OWN SHIRT...

WASH YOUR OWN SHIRT...
With the "unapproved" CNRP-NA first convention is about to open in Long Beach on October 4th, 2014; there is no resolutions to solve the infightings between the two factions within CNRP in NA --Sam Rainsy's and Kem Sokha's loyal supporters.
Many supporters who listened to the telephone conference on October 2nd here in the U.S are disappointed over the condescending tone of voice and message from Sam Rainsy to the many key supporters who have helped CNRP for many years.
His strong message to them was that CNRP in Phnom Penh is unable to solve the many problems created by CNRP supporting groups here in the U.S and Canada. For the time being, CNRP supporters can do whatever they want to help support CNRP... Any group who can serve CNRP in Cambodia better or best will be recognized as such...
The key message was for the overseas supporting group to " wash their own shirt..." for no one in Phnom Penh can "wash their shirt" for them. NICELY PUT!
While CPP supporting group is having their party in Massachusetts, let's hope that there will be no egg throwing demonstration organized by Long Beach CNRP to disturb the first convention of the current "CNRP-NA" of KimLy Cheaand his team.
And the dance party...will be without Sam Rainsy, of course.
----


Thursday, December 19, 2013

Human Rights or Wrongs?

Picture from the Phnom Penh Post          See full story here: http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/activist’s-facebook-firestorm

Human right or wrongs?


Virak's comment drew barrage of attacks from many individuals on Facebook. Some attacks are very blunt and quite heinous by calling him all sort of names and painting him with a broad brush. Ou Virak is a brother of Ou Chanroth and Ou Chanrith, both are now higher-ranking members of CNRP. I know both of them.

Whether we agree with Virak or not, Cambodians should exercise our restraints so that we don't go too far... as far as to character assassinate this brilliant young man who has served Khmer interests for many years.

I would encourage all of our friends to become brothers and perhaps we should dig for reasons to applaud rather than to scratch for excuse to gossip or to hate. I don't believe that Virak has any tiny bone in him that he would hate Cambodia or Cambodians. All of us, especially Cambodian political leaders, must tone down their rhetorics during this challenging time. Thinking before saying is better than saying before thinking. Maybe we should bite our tongue more often and taking the time to praise those who dare to do good for Khmer people regardless which side they belong to.

Virak may have a few points…on the Thais and the Vietnamese issues:

Politicians should show the world that they can work with the Thai and the Vietnamese, not against them. The United States are dealing directly with Vietnam now. UNTAC somehow tainted and established the word Yuon as racial. The Opposition needs to watch what they say, how they say and stop instilling and inciting fears into Khmer people’s mind about the Vietnamese issue. Fears feed more fears. Racial connotations should be tuned down and toned down. Teaching the people to understand our history and to help stop illegal immigration does not have to include racial attacks and or painting people with the same brush.

Bigger nations like the United States and other democratic nations that deal directly with Thailand and Vietnam won’t be able to help us much if we are perceived as racist. Even if Sam Rainsy is the Cambodian Prime Minister, he will have to work with the Thai and the Vietnamese. These two nations will still have major influences over Cambodia regardless of who runs it.

Remember, " it’s the economy stupid?" The world now is different.

Thank you.

Friday, August 9, 2013

On widespread protests: Prevent violence is a better choice!



On widespread protests: Prevent violence is a better choice!


It is almost certain that if the widespread protests were to happen, violence would follow.

The violence is likely to happen not because the leaders want it to occur, but because the leaders cannot control the situations in which the emotions of hatred, anger, revenge, fears and jealousy, etc.… are high among the participants. Such emotions have been instilled in people’s heart and mind for quite some time. Mostly are from careless using of political rhetoric.

When you put an angry person by himself to yell and scream on the street, the effect of his anger is small and less harmful; however, when you place thousands of people who are hateful, angry, revengeful, fearful and jealous in the same place, you will multiply the harmful effects by thousands times. It is likened to pouring thousands of gallons of deadly fuel onto a small fire. The negative emotions are high and all you need is a little spark of fire to detonate. 





It is the Universal law. Negative attracts more negatives and they just cannot produce positive results.

Cambodia has gone through such situations many times in the past. That is one of the reasons why its populations have been reduced to where they are now. They have killed each other from within with such negative emotions and attitudes that are not well analyzed and understood.

Cambodians have spoken their mind on the 28th of July. They had chosen to go to voting booths to use the ballots because they wanted peaceful solutions to their many challenges in life. There is no reason political leaders cannot do the same—using all peaceful means to help those who voted for them.

Help fulfill their dreams rather than break their heart and trust. Stop the rhetoric and prevent violence while you still can.

It’s a better choice.

Peace!
Timothy Chhim
New York 08-08-13

Saturday, May 25, 2013

Fact or Fiction: Can you tell?

Fact or Fiction?


Whether it is off line or on line, if an author is a scaremonger, scandalmonger, rumormonger, manipulator, or hate writer who write with the intention to confuse readers, to harm or hurt individuals, to threaten or destabilize a society or a country; that author is out of line.

A sample from FaceBook

The majority of Cambodians still live in a fragile society. They have good heart yet are prone to believe in misinformation and deception. 



A sample of one of the publications posting on KI-Media


Hearing, seeing, reading any false publications can have adverse effects to their thinking---which require more training and learning how to think accurately.




As for a reader, it is important that he or she "can read” and knows how to read.

The ability to "read" should include the skill to separate fact from fiction; understand the truth versus false and to think accurately and to analyze with care if the given information is just propaganda for political gains.

Misinformation, disinformation and deception are the effective works of the Devil.

Beware!

Timothy Chhim




Saturday, May 18, 2013

Cambodian Politic: Brother Enemy and Family Business

Cambodian Politic: Brother Enemy and Family Business


http://www.khmer.rfi.fr/kem-sokha-attacked-by-his-own-brother

Political fighting between family members is family business as usual.

In business if one brother works for Coke, the other works for Pepsi, regardless of which company wins or does well in the market place, both brothers will benefit from the success of their respective company.

In Cambodian politic, thus far, like many politicians, Kem Sokhon and Kem Sokha have defected a few times—that is Cambodian political norm. Both brothers claim that they have been seeking for a better solution for Cambodian people. Can anyone guarantee their moves in the future?

Something to think about:


Social activists use social issues as their business venture, religious workers use religion to make a living, entrepreneurs use business enterprises to enrich themselves, and of course politicians use politics to proper.

Benefits may come in different forms. Some prosper with money, others with name and fame; many with “title” designations.

A few good men/women who want to get into politics for national interests don’t last.

In the end it is the supporters who pay the price--financially, mentally, and spiritually.

Meanwhile Cambodia is still waiting for a better team.

Timothy Chhim




"Silence is not necessarily golden"

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

The Cambodian Oppositions and their Negative Campaigning Are they the forces of positive changes?


The Cambodian Oppositions and their Negative Campaigning
Are they the forces of positive changes?


The oppositions should be the forces of positive thinkers for positive changes and should avoid being too negative to the point that they can be called extremists.

Most philosophers agree that only positive thoughts can attract positive people and yield positive outcomes or results.  Positive thinking has been accountable for all major accomplishments in the world. Negative thinking or stinking thinking rarely or never yields positive results.

From time to time I check into KI-Media. Blogspot.com, the Khmer Intelligence blog that is widely believed to belong to Sam Rainsy’s supporters or even Sam Rainsy’s Party (now the newly formed Cambodia National Rescue Party.) 


Although some cut and pasted articles are useful and informative, the majority of written and posted articles, caricatures, perverted pictures and commentaries are ferocious, deceitful and distasteful.


Those who oppose Hun Sen's regime and Hun Sen's supporters may not like top Cambodian monks and label them as terrorists, but there are millions of Cambodians who do respect them as their religious leaders. Offending their religious leaders maybe counterproductive.  


From Ki-Media.blogspot.com

Poems, responses as well as comments expressed by readers and by those who are allowed to post their postings are extremely offensive and violent.  Such contents and languages really make Hun Sen’s ruthless tongues as by far more reasonable indeed.



I personally understand the anger, frustration and resentment that many Cambodians have with the CPP, it’s leaders and their Vietnamese ally, but I disagree with the languages used by those who claim that they are much better than Hun Sen and his team. Especially, those who have been groomed or schooled and trained in the West or in the United States.

They should have higher moral standard than those whom they believe as evil in a third world country like Cambodia. Such languages, displays and presentations are beyond being humorous or amusing. They represent hatred and profanity. How do  they expect to get help from other "good leaders"of the world? 

From Ki-Media.blogspot.com

I believe you should be able to bring your messages to the world in civilized manners without resorting to cursing, blaspheming, and using vulgar languages. Negative and extreme languages only attract negative and extreme people and negative individuals repel good and decent people.  Any misinformation or wrongful accusations can only damage your very own reputation.

From Ki-Media.blogspot.com

I realize that many people believe that the only way to change the country is to "curse" its leaders out or to prove them devilish. Those dictators maybe evil in certain individual's mind, but may not be in all Cambodian people’s mind. 

From Ki-Media.blogspot.com

If and when you are being labeled as a group of extremists, you are finished. I assume that KI’s business is to help the oppositions to succeed in their quest—to win the next general election.  Otherwise, you are only doing Hun Sen a favor by making him as a more reasonable man.


Be the forces of positive changes!

If you want to be a force of positive thinkers who want to bring positive changes to Cambodia you should change the way you think, speak and act.  There is no need to kowtow or bow down to Premier Hun Sen or to agree with his leadership ability, but you need to earn respects from the world community and from Cambodians at large.


One way to earn admirations from the Cambodian people is to become calm, cool and collected. There are plenty of words that describe our feelings that will yield positive outcomes.

One of the great advices from our Cambodian forefathers is,” Samdeiy Sar Jeat, Mearyeat Sar Pouch” or “your words represent your nationality (or who you are) and your characters represent your origin.” 

To defeat our adversaries or opponents we need to really"focus"on winning not to curse with anger and hatred. We need to think accurately. Accurate thinking and controlled attention cannot be done when we possess negative emotions. Be the forces of positive changes!

There are many ways to skin a cat, but don't do it when you are angry or when you are out of your mind.

Timothy Chhim
New York
3-27-13


http://www.talentsmart.com/articles/How-Negativity-and-Complaining-Literally-Rot-Your-Brain-1719177667-p-1.html

http://www.tom2tall.com/Travis-Bradberry-Negativity-and-Complaining.html

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Cursing for help! Will it work?


Cursing for help!


While Sam Rainsy is awaiting a possible compromise from Premier Hun Sen and the Cambodian King Sihamoni for a potential return of Sam Rainsy to Cambodia, SRP’s supporter staged a rather hostile protest condemning Hun Sen as a traitor to Cambodia by stepping on and burning Hun Sen’s portrait.

Pictures: RO of SRP-Europe

Such a protest probably was not approved by Sam Rainsy; regardless, it probably had gone too far under this particular circumstance.

It makes Sam Rainsy's recent request to Hun Sen meaningless. It may also mean that there is a lack of coordination between Sam Rainsy and SRP’s supporters.

We should also learn that hostile protests have never been really effective. Trained world’s leaders do not pay much attention or want to help any people who “curse for help.”

Peaceful demonstrations with positive slogans and appeals would bring positive results.Reacting make things worst, responding makes things better.

Democratic lovers should behave better than some dictators who know very little about good manners.

A good manner does matter.

Timothy Chhim
October 23, 2012

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Congratulations Sam Rainsy: A good move to reconcile




Mr. Sam Rainsy (L) and Mr. Hun Sen during an unexpected meeting in front of the National Assembly in 2006.

http://www.voacambodia.com/articleprintview/1528966.html

It is now up to Premier Hun Sen and His Majesty King Sihamoni to help reconcile among all Khmer brothers.

On October 15 I wrote on this blog suggesting that a phone call should be made (by someone).... and all Khmers should use this sad  occasion to reconcile. Now 3 days later, Sam Rainsy has made a move to reach out.  Congratulations.

If you think you can, you can.

Timothy Chhim
October 18, 2012.


Sunday, September 30, 2012

Negative Campaign: It will not work!

Negative Campaign: It will not work!

Let’s hope that Cambodian political campaigns are more about serious issues and not about who can scream the loudest or who can curse better. However, until now leaders of the oppositions as well as the ruling party are trying to outshout each other hoping to win voters’ attention, to show their power or perhaps in order to gain their respect.

Besides the shouting matches, the oppositions somehow do not like President Obama to visit Cambodia. Many people think that they shoot themselves in the foot.

Obama’s visit should be encouraged. Let him see the truth and judge Hun Sen’s regime on his own. The oppositions should not be worried or fearful about the visit of any leaders of the world. The culture of trying to stop any leader from visiting Cambodia should be discontinued. It is backfired. There are other ways to bring our concerns to them. Disorganized demonstrations against political leaders or random petitions only show how week the oppositions are and for many years they have not been helpful.

Shouting, cursing, demonstrating and petitioning may not earn much respect from the world’s leaders as well as from the Cambodian people. Good leaders gain respect by the manner they conduct themselves. Good morality is among other behaviors that the world and Cambodian people want to see. Negative attitudes repel supporters.

Perhaps it is time for the leaders of oppositions to change themselves first before declaring that they can change Cambodia. They must demonstrate to the people that they care about them, about Cambodia and about their supporters. They must show that they will always look out for people’s interests, not their own interests. Living in a luxurious villa while the people are hungry is a bad example to be a leader. Fooling around with people’s money is a destructive behavior.

A good officer always makes sure that the troops are provided for before he takes care of his own needs. If you ever expect to have authority over others, you must first prove yourself worthy. If you look to gain respect you must respect others, including your opponents. Remember, negativity repels. 

Timothy Chhim
09-30-12

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Politcal Merger: The new golden boy?

Political Merger: The new golden boy?

It is clearer now that the merging between Kem Sokha’s “Human Rights Party” and Sam Rainsy’s “Sam Rainsy Party” was likely created to help rescue Sam Rainsy as well as to prolong the life of Kem Sokha’s political profession. However, the persons who will probably benefit most from the merging are Kem Sokha as well as Hun Sen.

Picture from VOA.

It appears at the moment that Hun Sen will not allow Sam Rainsy to return to Cambodia, unless, like in the past, Sam Rainsy does something drastically to help benefit the CPP better than Kem Sokha can do.

One would remember that the main reason why Sam Rainsy changed his Party’s name from the Khmer Nation Party to his personal name was to avoid a possible internal coup staging by those who may be bought by the CPP. Such a coup has destroyed nearly all opposition parties thus far and the Cambodian political history speaks for itself. Now, Sam Rainsy has finally given up to such a long-term belief.

Recently, Sam Rainsy announced in advance that he would be the only Candidate for Cambodia’s Prime Minister representing the so-called National Rescue Party to oppose Hun Sen. Therefore, Hun Sen must allow him to return to Cambodia otherwise the election will be meaningless. Such an announcement has raised some eyebrows of some democratic lovers who thought that internal electoral processes among both parties (as well as others) should take place before any announcement is made.

Looking closely, people may also note that there are no such democratic processes, because the motives behind the merger was never meant to include any other individuals nor to truly embrace democratic processes to allow any other smaller opposition leaders to get involved. The top positions of the newly merged Party had already been previously handpicked. That is one of the reasons why people believe that the merging is not about saving Cambodia--- it is about saving individuals’ profession.

Nevertheless, if Sam Rainsy is not allowed to return, (which is more than likely) the second person in command of the not-yet-born “National Rescue Party” would be Kem Sokha. Without the presence of Sam Rainsy in Cambodia, Kem Sokha would push his way to run as the candidate for the Prime Minister against Hun Sen. Unquestionably, Hun Sen will win again.

It is well-known that Kem Sokha has a much closer relationship with Hun Sen than Sam Rainsy does. Kem Sokha’s brothers and relatives are members of the CPP holding good positions there. If Kem Sokha is used by Hun Sen to break up the New Party, there is no chance that Sam Rainsy can recuperate. The cooperation between Kem Sokha and Hun Sen in the future may be seen as the return of an old comrade in arm for Hun Sen and as a new victory for the CPP, but it would spell the end of the Sam Rainsy’s styled opposition as we know it until this day.

We should send a clear message to all Cambodian politicians that regardless how cleverly you package yourselves; people will eventually see through your masquerade and recognize you for what you really are. As a general rule, people will accept you for what you say you are until you prove yourselves to be otherwise. Don’t take advantage of the goodwill of the Cambodian people. They have suffered long enough from your game. As President Abraham Lincoln once stated, “You may fool all the people some of the time, you can even fool some people all the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all the time.”

"Silence is not necessarily golden"

Timothy Chhim
08-20-12

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Where past performance is guarantee to future results

To form long-lasting alliance individuals must share the same definite purpose and have the same burning desire to achieve that purpose. Top members of the alliance must work together harmoniously. Harmony is the key. Any frictions among leaders will not only cause total destruction to the alliance but will also put those who follow the leaders in greater danger.

While we don’t know for sure about Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha’s genuine motive(s) behind their recent hasty actions in Manila, we can presume that their mutual intention is to seek all types of support in order to win a little bigger or to gain seats in the general election next year.  The very least is to get the followers excited with this “special event” that usually take place before the elections.

Accurate thinkers know that with the current system in place there is no chance that the CPP will loose or yield their power to the two men. Accurate thinkers can tell that statements made by many politicians and reported by the media are not factual. Accurate thinkers do not form their opinions based upon newspaper, radio or television reports for such information are merely hopeful wishing and not the result of careful analysis of facts.

Past and present records and credibility of these two men are very important. Not long ago we had heard traceable bickering and internal strife between them and between their party leaders. Not long ago, Kem Sokha angrily stated that two men were likened to “oil and water.” They could not see each other eye to eye form many years. Suspicions and worries are still lingering among them and many followers. Now when the election is near, the pressure is on and not enough money is coming, they conveniently found a two day meeting in Manila to announce such an alliance. Both people have also had history of forming an alliance or coalition with different parties previously. Such past alliances had never lasted and many promises had not been kept.

Please use your own judgment and be cautious no matter who may endeavor to influence you. If these people’s actions and statements do not seem reasonable or do not harmonize with your own experience you may want to hold it in abeyance for further examination. Personally, I do want to see true unity among all Khmers where those with different political backgrounds join hands to help save and rebuild Cambodia.

I can only tell by using logical reasons found in natural laws: when any members of the alliance do not work together honestly and harmoniously, the alliance will be self-destructed. The lack of proof that these two men could work together in the past seems to suggest that the Alliance is temporary.  The distance between the two men is one of the many reasons that harmony between them is impracticable.

This statement should be viewed as a positive suggestion to members of the so-call coalition that without working in harmony toward their mutual definite purpose, the alliance will not last, hence the consequence. In this case “past performance” is guarantee to future results: the same.

Sample of political bickering: Mao Monyvan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-WXEdHXafE

Friday, June 3, 2011

Soy Sopheap: How Premier Hun Sen helped Kem Sokha regarding HRP

"Silence is not necessarily golden"

A little leak, a little lie and a little too late for the UNITY

Pictures and comments on the left are from KI-Media blogspot.com.
                                                                      
A secret phone talk between Samdech Hun Sen and Kem Sokha on July 25,  2007 has brought storms of criticisms from all sides.(Click here for Bayon TV's discussion.)

The leak had caused Kem Sokha to become the instant spin doctor for his HRP trying to explain why he had to speak to Premier Hun Sen regarding their strategy to weaken SRP, etc...(click here to read the transcript).

In Cambodian politics, lies can be called maneuvers. When a politician lies and get caught he may get away with it, if he/she can charm his/her way out of such a deception. After all, many voters may have a short memory.

Kem Sokha’s reasons why he needed to talk to Samdech Decho Hun Sen are ridiculous and unreasonable for many of us, but those who are on his side including his yes-men/women will find ways and means to justify Kem Sokha’s actions.

One may question why many other party’s leaders were not given the same opportunity (or didn't need) to talk with the premier to get his green light. However, Kem Sokha believes it is OK to have some candid conversations with different party leaders; after all Samdech is a Khmer, too (!).

It pays to know someone on the top, doesn’t it?

Some HRP’s members might suggest HRP’s Disciplinary Committee to take some actions against Kem Sokha, except they knew too little how HRP operates. The “democratic processes” inside this party exist only on paper. What Kem Sokha wants, Kem Sokha gets it. Nepotism does exist.

Many HRP's founders and key members have left because they had lost confidence in Kem Sokha and his organization. Others, who got smarter, have completely stopped supporting HRP. Nevertheless, other fanatic members will continue to believe in his "maneuvers" hoping some days they will reap personal and political benefits together. Those who knew about the talk (between Samdech and Kha) or other secrets and believed they were misled have already made their decision to jump ship.

It is believed that after this first little leak and little lie; many HRP members will have to reconsider their support. Members who believe that Kem Sokha directly or indirectly deals with Samdech Decho, will probably have to join CPP openly rather than working with its proxy.

SRP on the other hand will reap some immediate benefits from the leak. Many SRP’s leaders have questioned Kem Sokha’s motive and sincerity well ahead of the inception date of HRP.

The relationship between SRP and Kem Sokha turned bitter when SRP boycotted all Kem Sokha’s CCHR public forums in the early part of 2006 claiming that Kem Sokha had repeatedly attacked SRP in the open.

Recently, Kem Sokha stated that the difference between him and Sam Rainsy was like oil to water. If that is the case, what can we say about his relationship with Samdech?

Kem Sokha’s attitude toward SRP seems to be consistent. His conversation with Premier Hun Sen further reveals his true intention: to split SRP.

His primary target was not the CPP but the oppositions. Cambodian professional politicians who live on politics know very well that most members of the CPP are completely loyal to their leaders at all levels. There is little chance any CPP member will jump ship to be with a HRP; therefore, it is obvious that the creation of HRP has only helped weaken SRP as well as other oppositions.

Meanwhile, some overseas Khmers are still vulnerable to the belief that many members of the ruling party as well as the other oppositions will switch to support HRP because Kem Sokha’s HRP is “the best and the last choice Cambodians have.”

However, such a theory was just a propaganda aiming to find monetary support from naïve Cambodians abroad. It is unquestionable that the overseas Khmers love Cambodia and its people that is why some shrewd politicians manage to use the pain and suffering of poor Cambodians to squeeze our heart, soul and bank account.

More and more Cambodians in Cambodia now are much better off than they were and yet HRP have not been able to raise enough funds to support its operation. What are they trying to tell us?

Regardless of what Kem Sokha says or swears, the private discussion between him and Hun Sen helps enlighten Cambodian people that both HRP and CPP do have at least one common goal and the same opponent: the Sam Rainsy Party.

With this in mind Cambodians can put an end to their long waiting dream—a unity among the Non-CPP.  At the end the CPP and its affiliates will be the winner(s).

A little leak, a little lie and it is little too late for the UNITY.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Cambodian Politics: The true Democratic Party Vs the fake ones

The battles have begun, but who will win the war?

Picture from KI media
The banner in the background in Khmer says: Ture Democracy!

There are 28 months to go for the next general election to be held in July 2013. Cambodia's Democrats or the non-CPP political parties have begun their series of fighting to become the number 2 spot.


Some leaders of the oppositions are hoping to become Hun Sen's partner in the next Cambodian government. It is one of the promises used to string along those gullible members who can come up with large sum of money.

The hot battle this month is the struggle for Kg Cham's province where verbal artillery between Kem Sokha and Sam Rainsy had been launched. Cell phone or personal discussions are unsuitable; thus, both leaders exchanged their punches via open mails.

Kampong Cham belongs to top leaders of all parties. Kem Sokha ran as the number one candidate in 2008 and “won” without having to spend much of his own money. The person who spent most money in that province didn’t win and subsequently defected to the CPP. If you could ask him about the democratic processes inside HRP, he would tell you how much he needed to spend to be listed as a top ranking candidate in that province.

Kampong Cham is the most populated province in Cambodia. It is one of SRP’s strongholds besides Phnom Penh where SRP also holds 5 seats. 18 congressional seats will be up for grab in 28 months. For this mandate, the CPP holds 11 seats, SRP 5, NRP 1 and HRP 1.

CPP’s big gunners Heng Samrin and Hor Namhong and 9 others are in Kampong Cham making this province a must win for the CPP. Meanwhile Sam Rainsy, Kem Sokha and You Hokry, the heavyweight from the Non-CPP parties, are struggling to maintain their presence there. Every ones are hoping to maintain their current seat or to win more votes in July of 2013.
Picture from SRP Website
There is a slim chance for non-CPP parties to get more votes from the CPP's members; hence, it is easier for Kem Sokha to target SRP’s voters, especially when this party’s leaders are in trouble with the CPP.

It is necessarily for HRP to push for a few thousands more votes to get an additional seat. Otherwise, there will be no chance for others besides Kem Sokha to pay for the campaign in Kg Cham. In 2008, HRP got 72,772 votes and won only one seat. Some 30,000 votes were wasted.

The Absence of Sam Rainsy from Kg Cham may have contributed to the internal or personal fighting that caused Mao Monyvan to be expelled and later on defected to the so-called "true Democratic Party." People may wonder if there is such a true Democratic Party, then the rest of Democrats are the fake ones.

In 2013, Mao Monyvan will probably be appointed "democratically" by Kem Sokha to run in Kg Cham. More than likely he will be listed as one of the top candidates for he claims that most of SRP members will follow him. It would be interesting to know what will happen to those hopeful HRP candidates who have already been promised to be listed as one of the top contenders as well.

According to RFA news, the recent reception held by Kem Sokha in Kg Cham before the Cambodian New Year brought in about 500 new members for HRP. They were not all SRP members. It was included those dubious "hidden members" from the ruling party and other parties.

Why such a small number if the majority of SRP members in Kampong Cham were so unhappy about Sam Rainsy? Was it because of the Khmer Rouge styled system (accused by Mao Monyvan) that made SRP members decided not to defect en mass?

As reported by Soy Sopheap, there were about 90 percents of SRP signs were supposedly bought down. People may scratch their head for there must be something wrong with the above figure.

What Party the CPP would use to break up SRP?

The CPP’s interest is to see the fight goes on; especially, between the "true" Democratic and the “fake” ones. The best party for the CPP to support or employ in the fight against SRP is HRP. It knows that Kem Sokha and Sam Rainsy will never get along. NRP and FUN are already tainted as CPP’s allies. Some clues are found with Soy Sopheap's suggestion to Kem Sokha and to Mao Monyvan as seen on Bayon TV's Special program recently. Please click here.

If the CPP and HRP succeed in chopping down SRP, HRP will not hesitate to become a partner of the CPP in the next Cambodian government. This will leave SRP to remain the biggest opposition for the next 5 years.

While the battles between the so-called True Democratic Party and the fake ones go on, the real winner in the political warefare will be the CPP.

Turning Adversity to Avantage

Napoleon Hill says "definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement," and my personal definiteness of purpose...