Military Intelligence: Thailand’s military takes Bangkok’s “Military Attache” to visit Cambodian border & what the “Diplomat” reports
In Amart Military, Defense, Peace and Order on February 21, 2011 at 3:44 p3 Votes
Image via Wikipedia
Blog Note: The Thai military, with a well-known track record of nothing but public relations, propaganda and psychological warfare-says it is taking about 20 foreign military attache to tour the conflict plague Thai Cambodian border. “To see the truth,” the Thai military says.
Would the military attaches believe the Thai military? Or is it just politely, responding to the Thai military’s invitation-which is mainly for the Thai military’s internal public relations efforts.
The key message, the Thai general wants-from the event-is nothing but a psychological warfare on the Thai people that the Thai military has friends, and that its entire handling of the conflict-is right and correct-particularly, the message the military attache will get is that Cambodia started the war and that the Thais did not used “Cluster Bombs.”
Will the ploy work? Most likely.
If Thai Intel readers are in Bangkok, the news on the Thai Cambodian conflict looks straight out of the USA Press Center at the start of Iraq or Afghanistan War’s public relations play-book. That means it goes from the general’s mouths-straight into the press-no question asked, no checking for facts-no anything, the press just becomes a “Mouth Piece.”
It looks as if all the Thai media, are trying to copy’s the American news media “Hearst War” of the past example. For example, Cambodia calls for signing a permanent ceasefire with Thailand-the second the Thai leaders said “no” the Thai press reports the ceasefire proposal is a Cambodian ploy.
The Thai media, again refuses to learn any lesson-from the past. Being “Nationalistic” is now the duty of the Thai media. And against what?
Thailand’s defense spending a year alone, is about equal all of the Cambodians yearly government budget-and the Thai economy and military is about 100 times larger than Cambodia.
During the Thai military crackdown of the Thai Red Shirts protesters-the Red Shirts became the “Enemy” of Thailand. As the Thai General Prayuth, the Thai Army boss, said, “The Red Shirts are the enemy of Thailand that must be destroy.” And about 99% of the Thai media, immediately followed-calling for anything to get rid of the protesters-leading to the death of about 100 protesters.
The fact is, the Thai military took bull-dozers and tried to build a road in the Thai-Cambodian dispute territory, during very tense times, sparking the Cambodians to fire at the bull-dozers and resulting in subsequent barrages. Then on cluster bombs, internationally linked Cambodian cluster bombs center-confirmed the Thai military usage of them.
Those international units, linked with that Cambodian center-are among the globe’s most respected and credible.
Now, like the Red Shirts, the Cambodians are the “Enemy” of Thailand.
But in this Thai Cambodian conflict-who is the good guy and who is the bad guy?
The Following is from the Diplomat
(The Diplomat is a highly respected news media, specializing diplomacy, followed by most diplomat globally)
When I was publisher and editor-in-chief of the Phnom Penh Post I was once sued by then-Second Prime Minister Hun Sen. I was accused of spreading disinformation and trying to create political instability and, over the years, several Cambodian government officials accused me and my newspaper of attempting to ‘destroy the nation.’
So one thing I’ve never been called is the Cambodian government’s spin doctor. But on the issue of the current border dispute between Cambodia and Thailand surrounding Wat Preah Vihear, I’m as angry as the next Cambodian over what we perceive as a Thai-initiated conflict of grossly unjust proportions.
We’re not alone. Since this issue flared up two years ago, I haven’t met an Asian or Western diplomat, foreign aid worker,or expatriate businessman in Phnom Penh who disagrees. Even a few Thai friends have sheepishly expressed support for the Cambodian side on this spat.
The nagging question that perplexes us all is why Thailand is trying to export its domestic political problems and dump them on poor Cambodia? The feeling here is that if the Red Shirts and the Yellow Shirts want to fight it out, do so somewhere in Thailand, but don’t use Cambodia as a scapegoat.
The view from Cambodia is simple: the issue of sovereignty over the temple was decided back in 1962, when the case was submitted to the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
If Thailand didn’t want to abide by the court’s ruling, then why did it agree to submit the case in the first place? And why are they groaning now and firing artillery shells at the temple almost 50 years later?
When Thailand says: Well, we controlled the temple in the 1800s and before, the Khmers have a simpler reply: Yes, but we built it! We started construction in the early 9th century, modified and improved it for 250 years and then continued to pray there and celebrate our Gods for another three centuries until it was taken after the capital at Angkor Wat was sacked and looted three times between 1352 and 1431.
Cambodia has no interest in another protracted violent conflict with anybody. The Kingdom is still trying to recover from 30 years of civil war, Pol Pot madness,and the ensuing guerrilla conflict in the 1980s and 1990s that in total cost the lives of over 2.5 million Cambodians and left the country in ruins. Every dollar spent on the military conflict there is a dollar lost for building desperately needed roads, schools, and hospitals.
The Thai accusation that Cambodia has had some secret plot to steal Thai land along the border is also widely seen as ludicrous. It’s clear that since 1970, Cambodia has been too consumed with domestic strife to take even one metre of land from any of its neighbours. In fact, foreign aid officials who worked on the Thai border in the 1980s would likely readily admit that border creep worked in reverse. It was Thai farmers living in peace—and this is not to suggest a government-orchestrated campaign—who took the opportunity to plant a few extra hectares in the disputed border areas while internally, Cambodia was in complete disarray.
If there’s one thing that is clear, it’s that the entire border needs to be systematically surveyed and demarcated, step by step, once and for all.
As for the disputed 4.5 square kilometres just north ofthetemple, why not consider this: Turn the area into the Cambodian-Thai International Friendship Park and set it up as a jointly managed enterprise by both countries’ Ministries of Tourism. Invite in hawkers, entrepreneurs, whoever really, from both sides of the border to set up businesses to cater to the millions of tourists who will want to visit the site in the coming decades and beyond. Tax revenues could be shared by both nations equally. Everybody wins.
It could also be a model for other border disputes around the globe.
If Thailand wants a protracted, bloody fight on their hands over the temple, they’ll get one. In the 20 years I’ve been in Cambodia, the Preah Vihear issue is without question the only one that has united the entire nation. Cambodian TV stations have been running fundraisers off and on with donations large and small pouring in from all quarters for two years. Even the normally truculent Sam Rainsy Party and others in the opposition are fully on board.
It’s clear from a visit to the temple last week that the Cambodian military has dug in for the long haul. New heavy tanks, armoured personnel carriers and ammunition ‘donated by friendly countries’ are evident all over the base of the escarpment. Battle-scarred veterans, no doubt from all of Cambodia’s four previously warring factions and including ex-Khmer Rouge who controlled the temple from 1975 to 1998, are now all operating under one flag. And yes, of course there are Cambodian soldiers with weapons bunkered around the temple. If they weren’t there the Thai military could literally walk in and take control of it in five minutes. What government in Phnom Penh could allow that?
If this dispute gets really hot, relations between Cambodia and Thailand will be ruined for years, hundreds on both sides will die needlessly,and the economic costs to the two countries will be astronomical.
Cooler heads need to prevail. But rest assured the Cambodians will never, no matter what the price, give up control of Wat Preah Vihear.
Why would they? It’s theirs.
Michael Hayes co-founded the Phnom Penh Post in 1992 and was Publisher & Editor-in-Chief from 1992 to 2008.
So one thing I’ve never been called is the Cambodian government’s spin doctor. But on the issue of the current border dispute between Cambodia and Thailand surrounding Wat Preah Vihear, I’m as angry as the next Cambodian over what we perceive as a Thai-initiated conflict of grossly unjust proportions.
We’re not alone. Since this issue flared up two years ago, I haven’t met an Asian or Western diplomat, foreign aid worker,or expatriate businessman in Phnom Penh who disagrees. Even a few Thai friends have sheepishly expressed support for the Cambodian side on this spat.
The nagging question that perplexes us all is why Thailand is trying to export its domestic political problems and dump them on poor Cambodia? The feeling here is that if the Red Shirts and the Yellow Shirts want to fight it out, do so somewhere in Thailand, but don’t use Cambodia as a scapegoat.
The view from Cambodia is simple: the issue of sovereignty over the temple was decided back in 1962, when the case was submitted to the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
If Thailand didn’t want to abide by the court’s ruling, then why did it agree to submit the case in the first place? And why are they groaning now and firing artillery shells at the temple almost 50 years later?
When Thailand says: Well, we controlled the temple in the 1800s and before, the Khmers have a simpler reply: Yes, but we built it! We started construction in the early 9th century, modified and improved it for 250 years and then continued to pray there and celebrate our Gods for another three centuries until it was taken after the capital at Angkor Wat was sacked and looted three times between 1352 and 1431.
Cambodia has no interest in another protracted violent conflict with anybody. The Kingdom is still trying to recover from 30 years of civil war, Pol Pot madness,and the ensuing guerrilla conflict in the 1980s and 1990s that in total cost the lives of over 2.5 million Cambodians and left the country in ruins. Every dollar spent on the military conflict there is a dollar lost for building desperately needed roads, schools, and hospitals.
The Thai accusation that Cambodia has had some secret plot to steal Thai land along the border is also widely seen as ludicrous. It’s clear that since 1970, Cambodia has been too consumed with domestic strife to take even one metre of land from any of its neighbours. In fact, foreign aid officials who worked on the Thai border in the 1980s would likely readily admit that border creep worked in reverse. It was Thai farmers living in peace—and this is not to suggest a government-orchestrated campaign—who took the opportunity to plant a few extra hectares in the disputed border areas while internally, Cambodia was in complete disarray.
If there’s one thing that is clear, it’s that the entire border needs to be systematically surveyed and demarcated, step by step, once and for all.
As for the disputed 4.5 square kilometres just north ofthetemple, why not consider this: Turn the area into the Cambodian-Thai International Friendship Park and set it up as a jointly managed enterprise by both countries’ Ministries of Tourism. Invite in hawkers, entrepreneurs, whoever really, from both sides of the border to set up businesses to cater to the millions of tourists who will want to visit the site in the coming decades and beyond. Tax revenues could be shared by both nations equally. Everybody wins.
It could also be a model for other border disputes around the globe.
If Thailand wants a protracted, bloody fight on their hands over the temple, they’ll get one. In the 20 years I’ve been in Cambodia, the Preah Vihear issue is without question the only one that has united the entire nation. Cambodian TV stations have been running fundraisers off and on with donations large and small pouring in from all quarters for two years. Even the normally truculent Sam Rainsy Party and others in the opposition are fully on board.
It’s clear from a visit to the temple last week that the Cambodian military has dug in for the long haul. New heavy tanks, armoured personnel carriers and ammunition ‘donated by friendly countries’ are evident all over the base of the escarpment. Battle-scarred veterans, no doubt from all of Cambodia’s four previously warring factions and including ex-Khmer Rouge who controlled the temple from 1975 to 1998, are now all operating under one flag. And yes, of course there are Cambodian soldiers with weapons bunkered around the temple. If they weren’t there the Thai military could literally walk in and take control of it in five minutes. What government in Phnom Penh could allow that?
If this dispute gets really hot, relations between Cambodia and Thailand will be ruined for years, hundreds on both sides will die needlessly,and the economic costs to the two countries will be astronomical.
Cooler heads need to prevail. But rest assured the Cambodians will never, no matter what the price, give up control of Wat Preah Vihear.
Why would they? It’s theirs.
Michael Hayes co-founded the Phnom Penh Post in 1992 and was Publisher & Editor-in-Chief from 1992 to 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment