Saturday, November 24, 2012

Do we need an apology from America? Don't wait!

Do we need an apology from America? Don't wait!
Cambodians need no apology, we need to stand on our own feet and stop bickering and crying of being victims.
We have to learn from the fatality of more than two million people from 1970-to now. If we don't stand on our own feet and become self-sufficient no other countries will care and respect us.

Never mind about China, Russia, Vietnam and the U.S.. These countries which were supposed to share some responsibility in bringing Cambodia to fight in their hot and cold warfare would never come out to apologize to Cambodian people. Don't wait for that.

Cambodians need to move on. We must stand strong and learn from our past adversities. We know what we did and have done wrong by allowing ourselves and our country to be used by others.

Stop blaming them for there are more fingers pointing back at us for our past mistakes.  We live and share the imperfect world that everyone out there only looks out for him/herself.

As for  America's policy toward Cambodia, Cambodian must read and re-read Prince Sirik Mattak's letter to America written when Cambodia lost its war for freedom to the communists. Cambodia made the mistake, America did not. The U.S. did what it had to do for itself.

Here is the Prince's letter:

----------------------------
Dear Excellency and friend,

I thank you very sincerely for your letter and for your offer to transport me towards freedom. I cannot, alas, leave in such a cowardly fashion.

As for you and in particular for your great country, I never believed for a moment that you would have this sentiment of abandoning a people which has chosen liberty. You have refused us your protection and we can do nothing about it. You leave us and it is my wish that you and your country will find happiness under the sky.

But mark it well that, if I shall die here on the spot and in my country that I love, it is too bad because we are all born and must die one day. I have only committed the mistake of believing in you, the Americans.

Please accept, Excellency, my dear friend, my faithful and friendly sentiments.

Sirik Matak


---------------------------------
What Cambodians need is to focus on making Cambodia strong, to become a unified nation and prosperous.  We have infinite potentiality to become one of the richest countries in the Region. We did that previously. Our stone walls can tell. We live in a resourceful territory and we have to know how to preserve and to utilize our national resources to achieve that dream: to become one of the richest countries in the Region.
Stop bickering and begging for mercy or for a few dollars. Get busy in building our life, our society and our country.
Timothy Chhim
November 22, 2012
==================================


Does the U.S. Owe Cambodia an Apology?


Kudos to President Obama for not using his recent trip to Cambodia as an opportunity to apologize for supposed American sins of the past. His failure to do so must come as a grave disappointment to New York TimesWhite House reporter Peter Baker (an excellent reporter, by the way), whowrites an entire article lamenting the lack of an Obama apology.
His piece begins thus: “Four decades after American warplanes carpet-bombed this impoverished country, an American president came to visit for the first time. He came not to defend the past, nor to apologize for it. In fact, he made no public mention of it whatsoever.” He then quotes approvingly from the president of a group known as the Khmer Rouge Victims in Cambodia who claims that Obama “should offer a public apology to the Cambodian people for the illegal U.S. bombings, which took the lives of half a million Cambodians and created the conditions for the Khmer Rouge genocide.” He also quotes Gary Bass, a historian at Princeton who has written an excellent history of humanitarian interventions, who says, “It’s a missed opportunity for Obama.”
Actually, Obama was right not to apologize because it’s not clear what America has to apologize for in this instance. It is grossly misleading to suggest that the U.S. “carpet-bombed” Cambodia, which evokes images of B-52s pummeling Phnom Penh. What actually happened was that during Operation Menu in 1969-1970, the U.S. bombed North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong base camps in eastern Cambodia with the tacit acquiescence of Cambodia’s ruler, Prince Sihanouk, who was deeply unhappy with the uninvited presence of tens of thousands of Communist Vietnamese troops in his country. Along with the bombing there were several “secret” incursions by South Vietnamese and U.S. troops in 1970 to try to clear out Communist base camps.
The notion that the American bombing somehow made the takeover of the genocidal Khmer Rouge inevitable–in some account by supposedly driving them insane–is farfetched. The Khmer Rouge had been fighting to take over the country since the early 1950s with the active support of the Communist regimes in Hanoi, Beijing and Moscow. The massive incursion of Vietnamese troops into Cambodia in the 1960s, which they used as a staging area for attacks into South Vietnam, further destabilized the country. But what really made the Communist triumph inevitable was the fact that the U.S. Congress cut off aid to the anticommunist regime led by Lon Nol (who overthrew Sihanouk in 1970) as part of the general backlash against the Vietnam War.
The rise of the Khmer Rouge was not a reaction to the American bombing, and the bombing did not remotely inflict anywhere close to 500,000 fatalities. (Most casualty estimates are a fraction of that, and many of the dead were Vietnamese troops, not Cambodian civilians.) It is hard to see why the U.S. did anything wrong: If a country allows its soil to be used for military forays into a neighboring country, that neighboring country and its allies have every right to strike back.

No comments:

Turning Adversity to Avantage

Napoleon Hill says "definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement," and my personal definiteness of purpose...