Showing posts with label Sam Rainsy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sam Rainsy. Show all posts

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Prime Minister for Life

With the current electoral processes where people vote for a party not for an individual candidate, Premier Hun Sen will surely be the next prime minister until or unless: 1) he die, 2) is too old for the CPP, 3) he quits or else-- until he is forced out of the office like other dictators in other countries.


Many people in the oppositions and some observers probably bet or hope that Hun Sen will be forced out of power, but that chance is slim to none.

Looking at the top leaders of the CPP, it is unlikely that any one of them will be able to challenge PM Hun Sen without having a green light from Vietnam first.

Regardless how Cambodians feel about the Vietnamese, Vietnam does have great influences over the Cambodian People's Party. Whoever is skillful enough to promote special ties with Vietnam will have a bright future in this party.

Premier Hun Sen has also made it known that Cambodia owes so much to Vietnam for helping Cambodia from being wiped out by the Khmer Rouge--the former ally of Vietcong and North Vietnamese.

With the principle of virtuous gratitude or “Kunnathor” instilled in Cambodian’s frame of mind for generations, they will always be indebted to the Vietnamese. Likewise, the CPP members are thankful to their respective leaders as well as to Premier Hun Sen for giving them what they have so far.

With gratitude and personal interests in mind, the majority of voters will not mind to have Premier Hun Sen ruled Cambodia as long as he wishes. They deserve him.

Meanwhile, to date, the majority of Cambodian voters don’t see anything in store given by the oppositions; they have seen only empty promises. In additions the news and special events created by the oppositions are more of the same—disunity and disorganize.

Monday, March 28, 2011

The real obstacles to politcal unity

The main reason SRP changed its name was to avoid the internal coup that could split the party. We had seen such a coup in the past when internal fighting within a party split the party into pieces. It has been suspected that the split was the work of the ruling party which had the “ways and means” to buy out some greedy opposition’s leaders. But, you can't buy without a seller, can you?

Whether the work has been done by the ruling party or not, a self-named political entity can only last as long as the person with that name lives provided that he can hold on to his duty.

However, with the entire political arena controlled and monitored by the ruling party, the same can find the way to dismantle its opponents with little or no problems. The important thing is whether politicians truthfully believe in their own principles and are honest with their party and to themselves.

Being a father who is away from home, the family can be shattered; hence the concerns over Sam Rainsy Party without Sam Rainsy being home are understandable. It becomes clearer now that the theory behind naming a political party after one’s own name in order to stay united or to win does not work given that there is no proper democratic process in the political theater.

With the current electoral procedures, the oppositions have no chance to succeed. The political opportunity is set by the ruling party for the oppositions to play in order to legalize its rules. Many years ago Sam Rainsy said he would not become an alibi to the CPP, but as of today Sam Rainsy still wants to continue the same processes. His party has asked to the King to pardon Sam Rainsy so that he would be able to play again in the same uneven political ground. This reason proves that politicians use whatever tactics they can to stay in politic for it is their lifetime career.

Yim Sovann is rational enough for saying that some SRP defectors would only use other political parties such as HRP as a parking lot to move on. Some politicians have already done that. After all, Premier Hun Sen said he would always welcome more defectors to his party.

Learning from Yim Sovan meandering statements as well as my own experience, it is ashamed to find out that certain politicians are deceitful. A number of politicians are playing game by double-dealing having their family members working in different political parties to secure their family’s businesses and their own profession. Using the pain and suffering of Cambodian people as baits, some leaders mix up political and personal businesses at the expenses of innocent donors.

With regard to a mass defection, if it happens at all; it is not because one party is better than the other democratically. HRP is not democratic. Defection is about whether politicians see their potential in a certain party or not. Some people jump ship to seek a better position and/or for a better opportunity. After a while, when they learn about the new leadership and the lack of opportunity, they would do it again—and the final destination would be at the party that can offer them some money, security and position.

It is therefore reasonably concluded that, it’s not about the name of the party, nor about the democratic processes within a party that are the real obstacles for political unity. It’s about the attitude, level of commitment and moral obligation of many Cambodian politicians toward Cambodia’s national interests and toward their party’s principles.

Cambodian politic nowadays is nothing more than just a form of profession which is banking on the pain and suffering of the Cambodian people. However, if ones are mentally corrupted and blinded by money, sex and nepotism; no types of party on earth can help them win for Cambodia.

Regardless of what many corrupted politicians promise to the people, the smelling is too strong for most of them to believe.


Friday, March 25, 2011

Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia youths boost cooperation

Another boost of the cooperation of the three countries is unfolded. This time they focus on youths--the younger generations. The event held by Ho Chi Minh Communist  Youth Union

This reminds us of the creation of the Indochinese Communist Party formed by the Vietnamese great man Ho Chi Minh back in 1930.   Ho Chi Minh Youth Union was founded in 1931.

Some of us may want to learn why Cambodian youths are still interested in communism and what the future of Cambodia will look like.

While the so-called democrats or democracy loving leaders are fighting each other, the communists are united.

Learn from them! Point your arrow on the above red and blue organization then click and learn.

====================
NATIONAL
Thursday ,Mar 24,2011, Posted at: 15:09(GMT+7)
Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia youths boost cooperation

Young people from regional countries of Vietnam, Laos and 
Cambodia joined in a friendship meeting in Hanoi on March 23.

The event, held by the Hanoi ’s Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union, aims to create a forum for youths from the three countries to meet and exchange experiences in educating the young generation to treasure solidarity, promote traditional friendship as well as maintain peace and boost cooperation in the future.

The exchange, taking place on the occasion of the 80 th founding anniversary of the Ho Chi Minh


Communist Youth Union and the Vietnam Youth Year 2011, is a chance for Vietnamese youths to promote the country’s image as well as introduce their Lao and Cambodian counterparts achievements that Vietnamese young people have contributed to the country’s construction and defence.

In the framework of the event, participants will take part in a talk themed “Vietnam- Laos- Cambodia youths promote traditional solidarity and friendship for mutual peace, cooperation and development” to update each other on mobilising youth and promote youth’s roles in cooperation for socio-economic development of the three countries.

During the event, which will last till March 30, Lao and Cambodian youths will meet with Vietnamese students and visit the country’s historical sites and landscapes.
Source VNA

Opposition dilemma --The Unity is still in the clouds

Defection is nothing new...

Merging, cooperating, uniting, working together, etc. begin with the right attitude of all parties involved.

Nothing in their work now indicates that the Human Rights Party and Sam Rainsy Party can work together. It begins with the attitude of both men—the leaders.

However, if our national interest is not their number one priority they will never have the right attitude to unite. Given their personal records, I know Sam Rainsy is right—the Unity is in the clouds. I will elaborate later when I have the time.

============
Opposition dilemma
phnompenhpost.com

Human Rights Party President Kem Sokha has invited members of the Kingdom’s largest opposition group, the Sam Rainsy Party, to defect to the HRP following the announcement this week that ex-SRP lawmaker Mao Monyvann would join the party.


Mao Monyvann, formerly an SRP parliamentarian from Kampong Cham province, resigned from his post earlier this month before holding a press conference this week to criticise the SRP leadership, accusing lawmakers Yim Sovann and Eng Chhay Eang of wielding excessive control over the party. In the aftermath of his comments, the SRP asked him to resign from the party and he joined the HRP.

SRP head Sam Rainsy now lives abroad to avoid a pair of jail terms totalling 12 years that were handed down against him last year in connection with a protest he staged at the Vietnamese border in 2009. He was stripped of his parliamentary seat earlier this month as a result of his convictions.

“The HRP will become the biggest opposition party in Cambodia if Sam Rainsy cannot return,” Kem Sokha said.

“We do not want him to be absent – I want to have him here as a partner,” Kem Sokha added. “But if he is not present, I believe the HRP will play an important role in pressing for a change from the current leadership.”

Yim Sovann said Kem Sokha was “dreaming” if he thought the HRP could become the Kingdom’s largest opposition party, noting that the HRP only holds three seats in the National Assembly compared with the SRP’s 25.

The spat raises questions about the proposed merger between the parties, which have been in talks for months but have yet to reach an agreement.

Merger talks between the HRP and SRP have stalled in part due to disagreements about the leadership structure of a unified party. SRP lawmaker Son Chhay said yesterday that his party was still committed to the negotiations, but that Mao Monyvann’s public criticisms this week had prompted a reassessment of the proposal.

“The HRP used Mao Monyvann’s attack and broadcasted it on the radio, and it is not right to act this way,” Son Chhay said.

Senior CPP lawmaker Cheam Yeap said the recent bickering among the opposition parties showed that a merger was unlikely.

“They cannot live together, and it has been this way for a long time,” he said. “The SRP has 25 parliamentarians and they do not allow a party with three parliamentarians to control them.”

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Can Sam Rainsy Party survive without Sam Rainsy?

It is a real test for SRP, as this headless organization is trying to weather a violent storm. 

Internal power struggling (for positions and money) is generally the main factor. 

Without Sam Rainsy, SRP sooner or later will be crumbled.
 ======================================
 This article is from The PPP:

Photo by: Heng Chivoan
Mao Monyvann, a former Sam Rainsy Party parliamentarian who represented Kampong Cham province, speaks to reporters yesterday in front of the National Assembly in Phnom Penh.

Former Sam Rainsy Party lawmaker Mao Monyvann has blasted the SRP leadership one week after announcing his resignation from parliament, charging that a handful of opposition leaders have monopolised control of the party.

Mao Monyvann, formerly an SRP parliamentarian representing Kampong Cham province, stepped down from his post last week, citing “personal reasons” and a promise he said he had made to his supporters that he would leave his post if he failed to increase support for the party in other provinces.

At a press conference held yesterday morning in front of the National Assembly, Mao Monyvann told reporters that the families of lawmakers Yim Sovann and Eng Chhay Eang had taken an excessive amount of control of the party in the absence of SRP president Sam Rainsy, who fled the Kingdom in 2009 to avoid a court case against him and remains in self-exile.

“Sam Rainsy has national ideals and bravery, but this cannot liberate him from the power of these two families,” Mao Monyvann said. “Do we have any hope at all if Sam Rainsy cannot liberate himself from the grasp of these two families?”

Yim Sovann’s wife, Ke Sovannaroth, is also an SRP lawmaker and serves as secretary general of the party. Eng Chhay Eang’s brother-in-law, Kuoy Bunroeun, is currently a lawmaker representing Takeo province who is set to replace Mao Monyvann in Kampong Cham as part of a parliamentary reshuffle announced earlier this year by the SRP.

Mao Monyvann was set to move to Takeo as part of the reshuffle, which was originally supposed to go into effect on Thursday but has since been postponed indefinitely. Mao Monyvann rebuked the party for this postponement, calling on it not to “return the words to its tongue”.

Mao Monyvann strongly denied having plans to defect to the ruling Cambodian People’s Party or any other party, though he said he preferred the leadership of the opposition Human Rights Party to that of the SRP.
Yim Sovann denied yesterday that his family wielded inordinate control over the party.

“In the SRP, a few individuals cannot do whatever they want,” he said. “There are millions of supporters – a few people cannot do whatever they want without a collective decision.”

Yim Sovann added that Mao Monyvann was within his rights to raise complaints, but that the SRP was confident in its strategy to take on the ruling party.

“It is normal that every decision will not make everyone happy,” he said.

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Give rooms to the younger generations

Cambodian political landscape is now being divided into two main playing groups: the CPP and the Non-CPPs. While the CPP is still the “CPP,” the Non-CPPs are alienated into smaller parties including those which side with the CPP and those who claim to be democratic and nationalistic. For many years there have been speculations that the CPP would be crumbled, the rumors, however, have been falsely used to drum up supports for the Non-CPPs.

Both--the CPP and the Non-CPPs-- have been working hard to discredit their opponent(s.) The opponents to the CPP see nothing that the CPP does right and merely looking to count on what the CPP does badly so that they can gain popularity. The CPP, on the other hand, is trying to restrain its oppositions from pointing out what it does wrong and has used Cambodian legal system quite effectively to curb it opponents. The Non-CPPs seems to learn quite slowly not to walk into the CPP's legal trap.

While both sides are trying so hard, the CPP has the advantages over its opponents on all fronts. It has better financial backups, stronger infrastructures, and superior managerial skill. In addition, nearly all media networks favor the CPP and have had better relationship with the ruling party because of their financial ties and rewards. Many of us like to think that the CPP controls the media, but in reality, the media have been friendlier to the CPP because of their social ties, political ties, and financial interests. It should be noted that many newspapers in Cambodia belong to certain members of political party and independent newspapers do not exist.

Recently, the CPP has also infiltrated into overseas Cambodian communities and has done well in building its political and social networks in the US, Australia and in Europe. Pictures from Cambodia via Karaoke machines, television shows and tourists certainly make many overseas people think that Cambodia is now acceptable; hence they believe that Cambodia has been drastically improving. The CPP has managed to soften many hearts with their repeated propaganda and the help of overseas Khmers who have produced all kinds of entertainment products.

While the CPP has achieved its goals in many areas, the Non-CPPs are running out of valid reasons to effectively oppose the CPP. The passage of the anti-corruption laws will make the CPP smell better and it spells bad news for the oppositions. Those who look to get rich by becoming politicians or public officials to oppose the ruling party will have to think twice about their investments in Cambodian politics. Those who belong to the CPP have already achieved their financial riches and will continue to use their financial strength to protect their party's and personal interests.

What is left for the oppositions to attempt is their concentration on the emotional issues which strongly relate to Cambodia’s borders with Vietnam, human rights abuses, illegal immigration and political oppression. The key to their success will rest on what the majority of the Cambodians think. Will these particular issues matter to them on a daily bases? What matters to the oppositions might be irrelevant to ordinary Cambodians who have lived hand to mouth for many years.

Confrontation against the CPP will continue. Sam Rainsy and his party’s leaders have been working hard to expose Hun Sen and the CPP weaknesses, especially in the areas of border issue with Vietnam. Sam Rainsy even terms the arrest of the Thai engineer as being plotted by Hun Sen (and the Pheu Thai Party) in order to “divert public attention on Phnom Penh’s inaction against Vietnam's encroachment on thousands of square kilometers of Cambodia's territory.” Meanwhile Mme Mu SocHua has tried to win over Hun Sen on another issue- -the Women Rights issue. The leaders of the international community and NGOs seems to be very sympathetic and impressed with Mme Mu and her mission, unfortunately, Hun Sen also knows quite well that they are not Cambodian voters.

In reality, it’s the voters and the general gelection in the future that count. Most Cambodians do not care about some complicated issues that do not immediately affect their own pocket. They live day by day along with the ones whom they see the most--members of the CPP. Cambodian cultures have bonded those people together for many years and loyalty is the best policy for members of local Cambodian community.

With the current system in place the “déjà vu” of the electoral process will happen again. The CPP will employ their tricks and treats to win the heart and soul of Cambodian voters once more. With its financial strength, well established organizational structures at all levels and the “50% plus 1” system, the CPP will rule Cambodia for another 5 years from the next general election date. By then some kinds of the opposition party or parties continue to exist for just the alibis of the Cambodian People’s Party. The lack of organizational skill, manpower, and financial supports will drive members of the oppositions to defect to the ruling party. Cambodia and Vietnam will complete most of their tasks and there is nothing that ordinary Cambodians can do about that.

A few of those new and old professional politicians will manage to convince some susceptible overseas Khmer people to help support their life style in Cambodia for being heroic to fight against the CPP and its political machine. However, in real life there is not enough new blood Cambodians or resources to help support any viable political or non political movement to successfully challenge the CPP.

There will be no other alternative to help Cambodia better than the political processes which require all Cambodians to unite. This is the new challenge that the younger Khmer generations have to figure out. The older generations have had their opportunity to save and serve Cambodia, but for the most part, they have only saved and served their own personal interests. A drastic change is needed. Those who have failed to achieve true success for Cambodians and Cambodia need to step aside to make room for a fresh set of leaders to truly save and serve Cambodia. They cannot go on doing the same things and expect the difference.

Turning Adversity to Avantage

Napoleon Hill says "definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement," and my personal definiteness of purpose...